Book
Reviews
Issue 30(1)
Most
College Students are Women: Implications for Teaching, Learning,
and Policy. (2008). J.K. Allen, D.R. Dean, and S.J.
Bracken (Eds.). Stylus Publishing. 193 pp., $29.95. ISBN 1-57922-191-2
.
Review by: Monica
Parikh
Director, Learning Resources
and Advising Outreach
Santa Clara University
(CA)
This book is an array
of current scholarship on women’s experiences on college campuses
and provides us with works dedicated to enhancing their learning
environments. Each chapter differs greatly in purpose and point,
but this collection of research suggests students seek an integration
of their personal and academic lives: learning in- and out-of-class. The
volume encourages administrators to integrate academic and student
affairs to optimize women’s higher education through awareness,
advocacy, and action.
Here we are given useful
evidence that integrated learning will enhance women’s education
and success. One chapter finds females most frequent worry is
whether they will be well-prepared for “real life” (work, finances,
time management, planning their futures). Another chapter shows
that females flourish under the Learning Partnership Model (LPM)
in administration, faculty, and curriculum design/development. LPM supports
student identity development and engages them as partners in their
own educations. A third chapter applauds administrators who value
integrative education and connecting the classroom to experiential
learning.
Allen, Dean, and Bracken
assembled deep works from diverse fields: the neurophysiology
of developmental growth, women in technology careers, online learning,
race and gender, and adult learning. While this book is no “prerequisite”
for advisors supporting female students, its slightly disjointed
material is a veritable treasure trove. Readers learn that when
women recapture and review experiences (journaling, counseling,
debriefing), they often make new meaning of them, and think differently
about the present and future (p. 61). Academic advisors could
encourage women to journal about their experiences, or morph advising
appointments into conversations to this end. Readers also find
a list of prerequisites for female students’ learning including:
acceptance, comfort, confidence, and perceived value of the task.
Faculty and administrators (particularly academic advisors) are
fully capable of providing this to each student, female or male.
The thesis is a common
one: we must design new systems that integrate in- and out-of-class
learning and unite student- and academic-affairs professionals.
Not a how-to guide by any means, the editors use this text to
prescribe steps for advisors, advising administrators, and curriculum
design committees interested in building more integrative coursework
and academic support. Meanwhile, this volume’s rich value comes
from exposing readers to the research, practice, and praxis in
the education of women. An academic advisor would benefit from
fluency with this text’s language (disciplinary and interdisciplinary,
in and out of feminist studies), its perspectives, trends over
time, and recommendations for future practice, since most college
students are women.