|
Awards Program
|
Outstanding
Advising Award Guidelines
-
Academic
Advising-Primary Role —
Individuals whose primary role at the institution is
the direct delivery of advising services to students.
-
Faculty
Academic Advising —
Individuals whose
primary responsibility is teaching and who spend a portion
of their time providing academic advising services to
students.
-
Academic
Advising Administrator —
Individuals who may provide direct academic advising
services but whose primary responsibility is as an administrator
or director of an academic advising program.
|
 |
Eligibility:
- Any individual serving as an academic
advisor, faculty academic advisor, or advising administrator
and employed by a regionally accredited post-secondary institution
may be nominated. NACADA membership is not required.
- Current members of the Board of Directors and Council are
not eligible for consideration for these advising awards.
After the member's term of office is over, s/he may then be
eligible for consideration.
- Previous Outstanding Advising Award winners are not
eligible. Previous Certificates of Merit recipients are eligible
only if a minimum of 5 years has elapsed since the certificate
was awarded and the nomination contains substantial new information.
- Previous
Outstanding New Advisor Award winners or Certificate of Merit
recipients may be considered for Outstanding Advising Awards
or Certificates of Merit if a minimum of five years has passed
since receiving the original award.
- Nominees
for the Outstanding Advising Administrator Awards must have
served as an advising administrator for a minimum of three years.
- Only one nominee per category from each institution
will be considered.
Criteria:
The Selection Committee will evaluate nominations on the evidence
of qualities and practices that distinguish the nominee as an
outstanding academic advisor, faculty advisor, or advising administrator.
Such evidence may include:
-
Strong
interpersonal skills
- Availability to advisees, faculty, or staff
- Frequency of contact with advisees
- Appropriate referral activity
- Use and dissemination of appropriate
information sources
- Evidence of student success rate,
by advisor or department
- Caring, helpful attitude toward advisees,
faculty, and staff
- Meeting advisees in informal settings
- Participation in and support of intrusive
advising to build strong relationships with advisees
- Monitoring of student progress toward
academic and career goals
- Mastery of institutional regulations,
policies, and procedures
- Ability to engage in, promote, and
support developmental advising
- Evidence of administering an academic
advising program that supports
NACADA's Core Values
- Evidence that the advising program
reflects the standards of good practice in the CAS
Standards and Guidelines for Academic Advising
- Participation in and support of advisor
development programs
- Perception by colleagues of nominee's
advising or advising administration skills
- Institutional recognition of nominee
for outstanding advising or advising administration
Submission Procedures:
Nominations must contain adequate factual or narrative material
that describes the extent to which an individual meets the awards
criteria. Include the following items and use objective data to
support the nomination.
- A completed Nomination
Form signed by the nominee and the chief administrative
officer responsible for the nominee's academic advising or administrative
position. Submissions lacking appropriate signatures
will not be evaluated.
- A summary of the nominee's
qualifications. In this key piece, the nominator
should summarize the extent to which the nominee meets the award
criteria, citing letters of support, data, or other materials
illustrative of exemplary performance as an academic advisor,
faculty advisor, or an advising administrator.
- Nominee resume or vita. Please limit
entries to material that pertains directly to academic advising,
presenting relevant information from the nominee's overall resume/vita.
Please include
a current job position description or
list of job responsibilities.
- A personal statement on advising or advising administration
by the nominee
- Appendices which support
the summary (item 2), such as:
- representative materials developed
by the nominee.
- letters of support from advisees,
colleagues, and administrators.
- other pertinent information from
nominator.
Appendices
should be limited to not
more than 20 pages
(20 sheets of paper printed front and back).
*
All materials must be collated.
*
Sections may be divided by a title page (colored paper may be
used for this purpose, if desired), and the entire packet should
be stapled together.
*
Packets that do not include all required materials will not
be considered.
*Nomination
packets must include only original documentation prepared
specifically for the NACADA Awards Program. Materials
intended for other award programs will not be considered.
Eight
(8) complete sets of
the Nomination Form and supporting materials (cannot be returned)
must be submitted to arrive no later
than Monday, March 1, 2010,
to:
NACADA Annual Awards
Program
National Academic Advising Association
Kansas State University
2323 Anderson Avenue, Suite 225
Manhattan, KS 66502-2912
NOTE:
It is recommended that nomination materials be sent by a shipping
service for which delivery can be tracked. NACADA always
sends an e-mail confirmation to the nominator upon receipt of
each submission. Contact NACADA at nacada@ksu.edu
if you do not receive an e-mail confirming receipt of your
nomination materials within a couple of days after you have
tracked and confirmed delivery online.
|