Categories:
Outstanding Advising Program Awards may be presented annually in a variety of categories. Categories may include, but are not limited to:

1. Programs serving specific populations of students. Examples include: adult learners, at-risk students, undecided students, student athletes, and graduate students.
2. Programs involving the administration and organization of advising. Examples include: advising models, advisor training, uses of technology, advisor evaluation, and program evaluation.
3. Additional programs not included in 1 and 2 above.

1. Any regionally accredited post-secondary institution may submit an application. NACADA affiliation is not required.
2. Previous winners of Awards or Certificates of Merit are eligible ONLY if three years have elapsed since their selection and the program has been significantly modified or altered.
3. Only one nomination per institution will be considered. The Selection Committee will not consider multiple nominations for different programs within the same institution.
4. Programs must have been operational for three or more years (time frame may include pilot period). Data to substantiate program effectiveness must be included with the submission. Programs lacking data to substantiate at least three years of program effectiveness will not be evaluated.

Criteria:
Evidence of an outstanding program will include, but is not limited to, the qualities listed below. In addition, program description, suitability for dissemination, and adherence to program guidelines are key factors in selection.

1. Innovative Quality — Represents new approaches to effective academic advising. If a program has been implemented elsewhere but is new to an institution, it is eligible.
2. Creativity — Demonstrates creative use of resources (human, fiscal, and physical) in the delivery of academic advising services.
3. Currency — Addresses current problems and issues in academic advising.
4. Institutional Commitment — Demonstrating commitment to advising throughout the institution.
5. Impact — Providing definitive evidence of positive student and/or institutional outcomes.
6. Transferability — Applicable to a wide variety of institutions.

Submission Procedures:
Nominations must contain adequate factual or descriptive material to enable the Selection Committee to evaluate the program, including:

1. A completed Online Nomination Form
2. A program abstract not to exceed 250 words.
3. An original, publishable manuscript not more than 2,500 words in length, typewritten and double-spaced, and in the following format:
1. Institutional description
2. Program development (how, when, and why the program was developed, including problems encountered, organizational concerns, budget, and other practical considerations)
3. Goals and objectives
4. Program description
5. Procedures used in program evaluation (quantitative and/or qualitative)
6. Results/outcome (impact on students and/or the institution)
7. Potential for adaptation by other institutions

*Nominations must include only original documentation prepared specifically for the NACADA Awards Program. Materials intended for other award programs will not be considered.

Supporting materials will be accepted, but will not be returned. Links may be provided from the NACADA web site to the web sites of the nominated programs, if applicable.

Online submissions for the 2012 Outstanding Advising Program Awards are due Monday, March 5th.