Advising
and Retention
Charlie L. Nutt
NACADA Associate Director
Read More About It! Annotated Bibliography of Retention Resources
The issue of student retention and
persistence has continued to grow in importance throughout the history
of higher education in our country. Early studies (Astin, 1977) focused
on the characteristics of those students who did not persist and such
studies were used as evidence for higher admissions standards or more
quality control of recruitment. However, beginning the 1970's the
research began to focus on what were the reasons students remained
enrolled and how colleges and universities could make changes or develop
programs which would increase the retention of their students.
In his research, Alexander Astin (1977,1993)
determined that the persistence or retention rate of students is
greatly affected by the level and quality of their interactions
with peers as well as faculty and staff. Tinto (1987) indicates
that the factors in students dropping or "stopping" out include
academic difficulty, adjustment problems, lack of clear academic
and career goals, uncertainty, lack of commitment, poor integration
with the college community, incongruence, and isolation. Consequently,
retention can be highly affected by enhancing student interaction
with campus personnel. Rendon (1995) indicates in her study that
two critical factors in students' decisions to remain enrolled until
the attainment of their goals are their successfully making the
transition to college aided by initial and extended orientation
and advisement programs and making positive connections with college
personnel during their first term of enrollment. Noel (1985) stated:
It is the people who come face-to-face
with students on a regular basis who provide the positive growth
experiences for students that enable them to identify their goals
and talents and learn how to put them to use. The caring attitude
of college personnel is viewed as the most potent retention force
on a campus (p. 17).
Academic Advising is the only structured
activity on the campus in which all students have the opportunity
for one-to-one interaction with a concerned representative of the
institution. Tinto (1987) indicates that effective retention programs
have to come understand, therefore, that academic advising is the
very core of successful institutional efforts to educate and retain
students. For this reason, academic advising, as described by Wes
Habley, should be viewed as the "hub of the wheel" and not just
one of the various isolated services provided for students. Academic
advisors provide students with the needed connection to the various
campus services and supply the essential academic connection between
these services and the students. In addition, academic advisors
offer students the personal connection to the institution that the
research indicates is vital to student retention and student success.
However, successful academic advising programs
cannot be solely responsible for retention rates on a campus. As
the hub, advising is one piece of the retention puzzle. Retention
efforts must focus on all components of the campus and building
strong and effective connections between the advising program and
the various components of campus. For example, as financial concerns
often affect student persistence, it is vital that advisors build
strong collaborations with the financial aid departments on campus.
Advisors need to be able to understand the policies and procedures
that affect students' financial aid as well as have a clear understanding
of how to refer effectively those students in financial need.
Since student indecision as to major or
career options is a primary factor in student persistence, advising
programs should have strong links to the career services on campus
as a part of any retention plan. Advising and career services should
be, if possible, interrelated so that students see the connection
between their academic planning and their career goals. Several
institutions, for example Rowan University ( http://www2.rowan.edu/ ),
have combined advising and career services into one unit where career
counselors and academic advisors are cross trained to work with
students in both areas.
Residence life is another area where essential
collaborations are needed with advising services in order to enhance
student retention and persistence. Several institutions, such as
the University of Georgia ( http://www.uga.edu/ )and
Kansas State University ( http://www.ksu.edu ),
have established advising centers in residence halls to provide
students with on-site advising and assistance. This model is extremely
valuable in establishing a sense of community where advising is
viewed as an essential part of the community.
Last, it should be clearly established
that academic advising is the direct link between the academic affairs
and student affairs components of a campus that can build a culture
of student retention. Several campuses, such as Coastal Georgia
Community College ( http://www.cgcc.edu/ ),
have established committees or advisory boards for advising which
represent all constituencies of the campus, including faculty, students,
student affairs personnel, and staff. Often these committees report
to both the Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs and Student Affairs
establishing that campus-wide collaborations, with advising as the
central focus, is necessary for establishing effective retention
efforts.
In these times of financial cut backs,
student retention, persistence, and success will continue to be
a major emphasis on our college campuses. Any retention effort must
clearly recognize the value of academic advising to the success
of students and the necessity that advising become a central part
of a collaborative campus-wide focus on the success of our students.
Charlie L. Nutt
NACADA Associate Director
[email protected] Read More About It! Annotated Bibliography of retention resources.
Astin, A.W. (1977).What matters most
in college: Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Astin, A.W. (1993).What matters most
in college:Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cookson, P. (Ed.) (1989).Recruiting
and retaining adult students.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass
Fujita. E (1994).Retention survey
of students: Suggestions for change and improvement and reasons
why students leave.Report of the President's Task Force on
Retention. Jersey City, New Jersey: Hudson Community College.
Noel. L, Levitz, R., & Saluri, D. (Eds)
(1985).Increasing student retention.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pascarelli. E., Terenzini, P. (1991).How
college affects students. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Rendon, L. (1995, May). Facilitating retention
and transfer for the first generation students in community colleges.
Paper presented at the New Mexico Institute, Rural Community College
Initiative, Espanolo, NM.
Tinto, V (1987).Increasing student
retention. San Francisco:Jossey Bass.
Retention /Attrition
information links within the Clearinghouse